Xiaomi SU7 Brake Failure Leads to First National Crash, Widespread Data Falsification Revealed

Manny Zhang
By Manny Zhang 3 Min Read

Xiaomi’s highly anticipated electric car, the SU7, has come under intense scrutiny following reports of crashes, misleading advertising, and quality control problems.

The controversy began with a crash involving a Xiaomi SU7 at the Shanghai Tia circuit on April 8th. The driver, a popular automotive blogger known as Tang Le, attributed the accident to brake failure. Tang Le reported a grinding noise when braking before the final turn, suggesting worn brake pads. This raises concerns about the car’s ability to handle high-performance driving conditions.

Further fueling the flames, another blogger, Director Shong, shared a video detailing his experience testing the SU7 at the same racetrack. Shong explicitly warned against pushing the SU7 to its limits due to insufficient braking capabilities for sustained high speeds.

These incidents highlight a potential safety issue with the Xiaomi SU7.

Adding to the woes, questions have been raised about the accuracy of Xiaomi’s advertised performance specifications. Doni, a leading Chinese automotive information platform, conducted independent tests and found discrepancies between advertised figures and real-world results. For example, the advertised driving range of 810 km fell short by a significant margin, reaching only 643 km in Doni’s tests. Similarly, the 0-to-100 km acceleration time of 2.78 seconds advertised by Xiaomi was clocked at a slower 3.24 seconds by Doni. These discrepancies suggest potential misrepresentation by Xiaomi regarding the SU7’s capabilities.

Consumer woes extend beyond performance. Reports from car owners detail various quality control issues with the SU7, including oil stains on new cars, a poorly designed air tank susceptible to damage, and a flimsy plastic front bumper. Additionally, problems with the car’s infotainment system, GPS, and charging system have been reported.

Further adding to the burden, insurance costs for the Xiaomi SU7 are surprisingly high. Premiums can reach up to 9,500 Yen for the Max version. Xiaomi attributes this to higher claim rates for electric vehicles compared to gasoline vehicles. However, consumers remain skeptical, questioning the justification for such high costs.

The controversy surrounding the SU7 doesn’t stop there. The car’s design bears a striking resemblance to the Porsche Taycan, leading to accusations of imitation. While Xiaomi CEO Lei Jun has acknowledged the similarity, claiming it as a tribute, it has raised questions about Xiaomi’s design originality.

Industry insiders have also chimed in, criticizing Xiaomi’s rushed development process and perceived lack of core technological innovation in the SU7.

With safety concerns, potential misrepresentation of performance, quality control issues, and high insurance costs, the Xiaomi SU7 finds itself in hot water. Consumers are advised to exercise caution and conduct thorough research before making a purchase decision.

Leave a comment